Amanuensis: A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another.
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, I share more transcriptions from The Manchester Journal (Manchester, OK). Judson Van Every, the brother of my great grandfather, Melvin Van Every, appeared often in the pages. These transcriptions were originally written down by Wayne York, a grandson of Judson Van Every. I found the transcriptions attached to an entry on an Ancestry Public Member Tree belonging to plnjmw. They are shared with her permission.
Last week, we saw Jud and his family left the Manchester area in April of 1910 for Idaho. But his travels didn't end there.
Monday, October 17, 2011
Saturday, October 15, 2011
SNGF: Ancestor's GeneaMeme
For tonight's Saturday Night Genealogy Fun, Randy Seaver at Genea-Musings suggested:
The list should be annotated in the following manner:
Things you have already done or found: bold face type
Things you would like to do or find: italicize (colour optional)
Things you haven’t done or found and don’t care to: plain type
You are encouraged to add extra comments in brackets after each item
[I've added some notes in brackets]
4. Have an ancestor who was married more than three times [several]
5. Have an ancestor who was a bigamist. [I am unsure the correct term was chosen here. Bigamy is always a crime, by definition. Someone who has a polygamist ancestor doesn't have a bigamist ancestor, as long as it was legal.]
6. Met all four of my grandparents [3/4]
7. Met one or more of my great-grandparents [1]
10. Have an ancestor from Great Britain or Ireland
11. Have an ancestor from Asia [No identified ancestor]
12. Have an ancestor from Continental Europe
13. Have an ancestor from Africa [No identified ancestor, though I'm sure if I were able to trace my ancestry back far enough...]
14. Have an ancestor who was an agricultural labourer [Both of my maternal grandparents grew up on a farm. I have to go a few generations further back on my father's side.]
15. Have an ancestor who had large land holdings
16. Have an ancestor who was a holy man - minister, priest, rabbi [Methodist and Mennonite]
17. Have an ancestor who was a midwife [A great grandmother practiced midwifery in Chicago after emigrating from Transylvania]
18. Have an ancestor who was an author [Ancestry's OneFamilyTree states Chaucer as my 18th great grandfather, but I have disproven that relationship. I do have a close ancestor who published a book on legal matters.]
19. Have an ancestor with the surname Smith, Murphy or Jones
20. Have an ancestor with the surname Wong, Kim, Suzuki or Ng
21. Have an ancestor with a surname beginning with X
22. Have an ancestor with a forename beginning with Z
23. Have an ancestor born on 25th December
24. Have an ancestor born on New Year's Day
25. Have blue blood in your family lines [I used to believe all my blood was blue, before it was oxygenated. However, this scientific myth is allegedly inaccurate. OneFamilyTree would tell you I have royal ancestry, but I haven't verified my lines.]
26. Have a parent who was born in a country different from my country of birth
27. Have a grandparent who was born in a country different from my country of birth [1/4]
28. Can trace a direct family line back to the eighteenth century
29. Can trace a direct family line back to the seventeenth century or earlier
30. Have seen copies of the signatures of some of my great-grandparents [All 8 I believe.]
31. Have ancestors who signed their marriage certificate with an X (not that I know of)
32. Have a grandparent or earlier ancestor who went to university [Both of my grandfathers. One of my grandmothers took college courses, though she didn't get a degree. My other grandmother enrolled at a university, but changed her mind, and didn't attend.]
33. Have an ancestor who was convicted of a criminal offence
34. Have an ancestor who was a victim of crime. [No serious crime I can think of offhand. Not counting petty theft.]
35. Have shared an ancestor's story online or in a magazine [I'm a genealogy blogger. That's what I do.]
38. Still have an ancestor's home from the 19th or earlier centuries in the family.
1) Participate in the Ancestors GeneaMeme created by Jill Ball on the Geniaus blog.The Rules:
2) Write your own blog post, or add your response as a comment to this blog post, in a Facebook Status post or note, or in a Google+ Stream item.
The list should be annotated in the following manner:
Things you have already done or found: bold face type
Things you would like to do or find: italicize (colour optional)
Things you haven’t done or found and don’t care to: plain type
You are encouraged to add extra comments in brackets after each item
[I've added some notes in brackets]
The Meme:
Which of these apply to you?
1. Can name my 16 great-great-grandparents
2. Can name over 50 direct ancestors
3. Have photographs or portraits of my 8 great-grandparents [I have photographs of 6 of my 16 gg-grandparents]4. Have an ancestor who was married more than three times [several]
5. Have an ancestor who was a bigamist. [I am unsure the correct term was chosen here. Bigamy is always a crime, by definition. Someone who has a polygamist ancestor doesn't have a bigamist ancestor, as long as it was legal.]
6. Met all four of my grandparents [3/4]
7. Met one or more of my great-grandparents [1]
8. Named a child after an ancestor. [No children yet. Getting married next year...]
9. Bear an ancestor's given name/s [My Hebrew name 'Baruch' is after my great-grandfather Barney]10. Have an ancestor from Great Britain or Ireland
11. Have an ancestor from Asia [No identified ancestor]
12. Have an ancestor from Continental Europe
13. Have an ancestor from Africa [No identified ancestor, though I'm sure if I were able to trace my ancestry back far enough...]
14. Have an ancestor who was an agricultural labourer [Both of my maternal grandparents grew up on a farm. I have to go a few generations further back on my father's side.]
15. Have an ancestor who had large land holdings
16. Have an ancestor who was a holy man - minister, priest, rabbi [Methodist and Mennonite]
17. Have an ancestor who was a midwife [A great grandmother practiced midwifery in Chicago after emigrating from Transylvania]
18. Have an ancestor who was an author [Ancestry's OneFamilyTree states Chaucer as my 18th great grandfather, but I have disproven that relationship. I do have a close ancestor who published a book on legal matters.]
19. Have an ancestor with the surname Smith, Murphy or Jones
20. Have an ancestor with the surname Wong, Kim, Suzuki or Ng
21. Have an ancestor with a surname beginning with X
22. Have an ancestor with a forename beginning with Z
23. Have an ancestor born on 25th December
24. Have an ancestor born on New Year's Day
25. Have blue blood in your family lines [I used to believe all my blood was blue, before it was oxygenated. However, this scientific myth is allegedly inaccurate. OneFamilyTree would tell you I have royal ancestry, but I haven't verified my lines.]
26. Have a parent who was born in a country different from my country of birth
27. Have a grandparent who was born in a country different from my country of birth [1/4]
28. Can trace a direct family line back to the eighteenth century
29. Can trace a direct family line back to the seventeenth century or earlier
30. Have seen copies of the signatures of some of my great-grandparents [All 8 I believe.]
31. Have ancestors who signed their marriage certificate with an X (not that I know of)
32. Have a grandparent or earlier ancestor who went to university [Both of my grandfathers. One of my grandmothers took college courses, though she didn't get a degree. My other grandmother enrolled at a university, but changed her mind, and didn't attend.]
33. Have an ancestor who was convicted of a criminal offence
34. Have an ancestor who was a victim of crime. [No serious crime I can think of offhand. Not counting petty theft.]
35. Have shared an ancestor's story online or in a magazine [I'm a genealogy blogger. That's what I do.]
36. Have published a family history online or in print
37. Have visited an ancestor's home from the 19th or earlier centuries [Have plans to do so next year.] 38. Still have an ancestor's home from the 19th or earlier centuries in the family.
39. Have a family bible from the 19th Century
40. Have a pre-19th century family bible
Monday, October 10, 2011
Amanuensis Monday: Judson Van Every - Manchester Journal - 1902-1910
Amanuensis: A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another.
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, I share transcriptions from The Manchester Journal (Manchester, OK). Judson Van Every, the brother of my great grandfather, Melvin Van Every, appeared often in the pages. These transcriptions were originally written down by Wayne York, a grandson of Judson Van Every. I found the transcriptions attached to an entry on an Ancestry Public Member Tree belonging to plnjmw. They are shared with her permission.
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, I share transcriptions from The Manchester Journal (Manchester, OK). Judson Van Every, the brother of my great grandfather, Melvin Van Every, appeared often in the pages. These transcriptions were originally written down by Wayne York, a grandson of Judson Van Every. I found the transcriptions attached to an entry on an Ancestry Public Member Tree belonging to plnjmw. They are shared with her permission.
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Week In Review
Below are some highlights from news stories and blog posts I have read in the past week that deal with my overlapping interests in Genealogy, History, Heritage, and Technology.
The following individuals participated this past Monday in the weekly meme I began back in February of 2009: Amanuensis Monday. I apologize if I missed anyone, as I had to rely on Google to find many of the posts. It is my understanding Thomas MacEntee at Geneabloggers will be back in town and tracking participation in the daily blogging prompts tomorrow.
Other Weekly Link Lists
Many of those who usually appear below post on Friday. However, Randy usually does an excellent job of listing other lists.
- The Ancestry Insider reports that the number of images at FamilySearch has surpassed Ancestry. FamilySearch has a lot of images that aren't indexed. James Tanner at Genealogy's Star notes that Ancestry has a lot of indexes without images. And without the images, there's no way to verify that the record has been transcribed correctly.
- Audrey Collins at The Family Recorder reminds us: "There are many popular records that you can find on more than one genealogy site, and if you don't find what you want one one site, it's a good idea to try another one." - Same BMD Databases, Different Sites
- Back on September 28th the Statistical Abstract of the United States was released. (hat/tip: Dublin Library)
- Diane Richard at Upfront with NGS discusses The National Archives five Tumblr accounts.
- The 110th edition of the Carnival of Genealogy has been released at CreativeGene. The theme: Which type of tree best represents your family history? The theme for the 111th edition is Autumn Weddings, with a deadline of November 1st. More details.
- Kerry Scott at Clue Wagon reports that Scientists Discover Virus Responsible for Genea-Skankery
The following individuals participated this past Monday in the weekly meme I began back in February of 2009: Amanuensis Monday. I apologize if I missed anyone, as I had to rely on Google to find many of the posts. It is my understanding Thomas MacEntee at Geneabloggers will be back in town and tracking participation in the daily blogging prompts tomorrow.
- Cheryl Cayemberg at Have You Seen my Roots?
- Claire at MahoganyBox
- Joan at Roots'n'Leaves
- John Newmark at TransylvanianDutch
- Karen at Genealogy Frame of Mind
- Leslie Ann at Ancestors Live Here
- RAH at Blundering Blindly Backwards
- Randy Seaver at Genea-Musings
- Yvette Porter Moore at Digging Roots: My Family History
Other Weekly Link Lists
Many of those who usually appear below post on Friday. However, Randy usually does an excellent job of listing other lists.
- Randy Seaver's Best of the Genea-Blogs at Genea-Musings
- Ruth Blair's Ruth's Recommendations at The Passionate Genealogist
- Elizabeth O'Neal's Best Bytes at Little Bytes of Life
- Julie Cahill Tarr's Friday Finds at GenBlog
- Liz Haigney Lynch's Links at The Ancestral Archaeologist
- Diane Haddad's Genealogy News Corral at Genealogy Insider
- Megan Smolenyak Smolenyak's Genealogy Round-Up at MSS's Roots World
Monday, October 3, 2011
Amanuensis Monday: Missouri Sheriff Has a Mule Problem
Amanuensis: A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another.
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, I transcribe another document relating to the ancestry of my fiancée. This is a newspaper article from The St. Louis Post Dispatch concerning her second great grandfather, Louis P. Gober (1867-1948). [The article was found at ProQuest Historical Newspapers.]
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, I transcribe another document relating to the ancestry of my fiancée. This is a newspaper article from The St. Louis Post Dispatch concerning her second great grandfather, Louis P. Gober (1867-1948). [The article was found at ProQuest Historical Newspapers.]
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Week in Review
This is being posted early this week, since I will be at a non-Genealogy Convention Friday morning through Sunday.
Below are some highlights from news stories and blog posts I have read in the past week that deal with my overlapping interests in Genealogy, History, Heritage, and Technology.
The Planetary Society weighs the implications of whether there is anybody who isn't 15-years-gone who could have been used in place of the guy on the left. (I knew who he was, but mostly because the background helped. I've heard of her, but have never watched her show, or seen her picture anywhere else. I declare myself not-to-blame.)
Other Weekly Link Lists
Many of those who usually appear below post on Friday. However, Randy usually does an excellent job of listing other lists.
Below are some highlights from news stories and blog posts I have read in the past week that deal with my overlapping interests in Genealogy, History, Heritage, and Technology.
- Barbara J Mathews at The Demanding Genealogist explains Conflicting Evidence - What is it?
- George Geder at Geder Genealogy considers the news story of Larrie Butler in South Carolina. South Carolina isn't accepting the man's appearance in the1930 census as proof of his date of birth, because the census taker spelled his name wrong. (Mr. Butler has provided the state with his college records, high school records, medical records, and military records. They demanded his elementary school records, and those no longer exist. Hence his attempt to use the census.)
- Amy Coffin at We Tree Genealogy responds to Reasons not to Attend RootsTech 2012. As a technogeeky genealogist, RootsTech does sound made for me. However, 2012 is going to be a busy year for me, as I am getting married, and already have some extensive travel planned for the summer. Maybe a future year.
- Tamura Jones at Modern Software Experience discusses the development of Ancestry's App for Android, explaining how users of devices with Android operating systems can get on a list for the Beta version. I have an iPod Touch, and have been playing with the Apple OS version for awhile. I definitely like it.
- Levi Sumagaysay at Good Morning Silicon Valley covers the new-Amazon Kindle Fire, as well as the controversy over Facebook's cookies tracking your browsing.
- Lynn Palermo at The Armchair Genealogist wonders what the New Kindles might mean for genealogists.
- Google announces that they have helped bring The Dead Sea Scrolls online (with English translation)
- Roy Tennant at Digital Libraries discovers some serious errors at Google Maps for his own neighborhood - it seems they may be using satellite photographs as sources to adjust maps, and assuming what may be just tree cover is actually the end of the road.
- If Virtual Monkeys have finally written a poem by Shakespeare, maybe I should start getting them to work on my ahnentafel. (Or, perhaps that explains the errors on Ancestry's One World Tree)
- This image has been making the rounds on the internet
The Planetary Society weighs the implications of whether there is anybody who isn't 15-years-gone who could have been used in place of the guy on the left. (I knew who he was, but mostly because the background helped. I've heard of her, but have never watched her show, or seen her picture anywhere else. I declare myself not-to-blame.)
- Thomas MacEntee at Geneabloggers is taking a rare vacation, so I will attempt to put together a list of those who participate in the Amanuensis Monday project. I'll include it in next weekend's "Week in Review" like I did before Geneabloggers started tracking the daily blogging prompts.
Other Weekly Link Lists
Many of those who usually appear below post on Friday. However, Randy usually does an excellent job of listing other lists.
- Randy Seaver's Best of the Genea-Blogs at GeneaMusings
- Ruth Blair's Ruth's Recommendations at The Passionate Genealogist
Monday, September 26, 2011
Amanuensis Monday: Verba Fulkerson's 83rd Birthday
Amanuensis: A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another.
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, in a first, I transcribe a document relating to the ancestry of my fiancée. This is a newspaper article from The Sikeston Herald noting the 83rd birthday of her 2nd great grandmother, Verba Blackman Fulkerson (1857-1947). [The article was found at NewspaperArchive.]
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, in a first, I transcribe a document relating to the ancestry of my fiancée. This is a newspaper article from The Sikeston Herald noting the 83rd birthday of her 2nd great grandmother, Verba Blackman Fulkerson (1857-1947). [The article was found at NewspaperArchive.]
Sunday, September 25, 2011
Week In Review
Below are some highlights from news stories and blog posts I have read in the past week that deal with my overlapping interests in Genealogy, History, Heritage, and Technology.
- Deborah Large Fox at Help! The Faerie Folk Hid My Ancestors discusses Ireland's new Certificate of Irish Heritage. This certificate is meant for anyone not born in Ireland who can document their ancestry back to Ireland. More details on eligibility and application procedures can be found at Irish Central. I doubt they will accept the bio my great grandfather Barney wrote as proof, but there are several members of my mishpochah with a better argument. (Since the certificate doesn't come with any entitlements, they might not really care how reliable the 'proof' is.)
- Jeff Baker, in a guest post at Geneabloggers, discusses Is Ancestry.com a Scan? 6 Common Misperceptions
- MIchael Hait at Planting the Seeds shared his First Encounter with Indirect Evidence
- Michael John Neill at RootDig discusses The Anonymous Census Entry
- The Ancestry Insider discusses the differences between census enumerations in Darned Second Enumerations
- Passive Guy at The Passive Voice discusses the adventures of Dorothy Parker's Ashes, as well as offers some legal insight (not advice) into estates.
- Letters of Note shared a 1990 exchange of letters between Marge Simpson and Barbara Bush.
- Todd Wasserman at Mashable discusses Amazon's announcement that Kindle E-books are now available at 11,000 Libraries.
- Melissa Mannon at ArchivesInfo discusses The Value and Pitfall of Tagging Tweets. Her discussion of the confusion that can be generated due to lack of uniformity in hashtags reminded me of a local controversy when several St. Louisan Twitter users got upset because some Twitter users in Lebanon were using #stl to refer to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Today, both uses co-exist, and there is international tolerance.
- Google moved Google+ from "Field Trial" stage to "Beta," and access to the social network is no longer 'by invite only."
- Facebook announced some major updates at their annual Developer's Conference
- Megan Smolenyak Smolenyak's Genealogy Round Up at MSS's Roots World
- Deb Ruth's Follow Friday Gems at Adventures in Genealogy
- Elizabeth O'Neal's Best Bytes at Little Bytes of Life
- Randy Seaver's Thursday and Friday "Good" Genea-Reads at GeneaMusings
- Diane Haddad's Genealogy News Corral at Genealogy Insider
- Ruth Blair's Ruth's Recommendations at The Passionate Genealogist
Monday, September 19, 2011
TLAPD and Genealogy
Repost of a 2007 post with some additions
1) Were any of my ancestors pirates?
2) Did any of my ancestors own parrots?
3) Did any of my ancestors like to drink rum?
4) Do I have any distant cousins who have played baseball in Pittsburgh?
Realizing I am unable to say 'yes' in certainty to any of these questions, I am a little glum on Talk Like a Pirate Day.
I know I have lime-burners, mule drivers, and tailors represented. If OneWorldTree is correct, I also have a 1930s bootlegger/massmurderer nicknamed "The Alligator Man" as a distant cousin. He may come the closest. OWT also claims that John Ledyard, who sailed with Captain Cook, is a cousin. Though, while they sailed off the Barbary Coast, and Cook rhymes with Hook, like so many in my family tree, they fought for the 'other side.'
***
Here it is 2011, and I can say yes to one of the four questions at the top of this post, sort of. #4.
Jonathan Van Every is almost definitely a cousin. I haven't traced his ancestry back with certainty to make the necessary connection. His Major League appearances have been with the Red Sox organization, but he has spent time as a Pirate. (Though not in Pittsburgh.) He now plays for the St. Paul Saints which is a professional team in the American Association, which is not affiliated with Major League Baseball. He has been named Defensive Player of the Year, so maybe he has a chance to return to the majors.
1) Were any of my ancestors pirates?
2) Did any of my ancestors own parrots?
3) Did any of my ancestors like to drink rum?
4) Do I have any distant cousins who have played baseball in Pittsburgh?
Realizing I am unable to say 'yes' in certainty to any of these questions, I am a little glum on Talk Like a Pirate Day.
I know I have lime-burners, mule drivers, and tailors represented. If OneWorldTree is correct, I also have a 1930s bootlegger/massmurderer nicknamed "The Alligator Man" as a distant cousin. He may come the closest. OWT also claims that John Ledyard, who sailed with Captain Cook, is a cousin. Though, while they sailed off the Barbary Coast, and Cook rhymes with Hook, like so many in my family tree, they fought for the 'other side.'
***
Here it is 2011, and I can say yes to one of the four questions at the top of this post, sort of. #4.
Jonathan Van Every is almost definitely a cousin. I haven't traced his ancestry back with certainty to make the necessary connection. His Major League appearances have been with the Red Sox organization, but he has spent time as a Pirate. (Though not in Pittsburgh.) He now plays for the St. Paul Saints which is a professional team in the American Association, which is not affiliated with Major League Baseball. He has been named Defensive Player of the Year, so maybe he has a chance to return to the majors.
Jewish Pirates: Ahoy Vey!
Repost from 2009 with slight changes
Today is International Talk Like a Pirate Day. The Jewish New Year is also approaching at the end of the month.
What would be an appropriate topic, albeit perhaps a little afield from the subject of genealogy, for a blog post combining the two?
How about Jean Lafitte, the possibly Jewish Pirate?
You can read more about Jewish pirates in Jamaica and elsewhere in the Caribbean at Tracing the Tribe.

What would be an appropriate topic, albeit perhaps a little afield from the subject of genealogy, for a blog post combining the two?
How about Jean Lafitte, the possibly Jewish Pirate?
[image - late 19th century artist's conception. [source]
As a St. Louisan, this last definitely interests me. Though I have been unable to determine where John Lafflin (whether or not in reality Jean Lafitte) is supposed to be buried. Mysteries tend to surround pirates, don't they?The facts of his origins, and those of his demise as well, depend upon whether you believe the "Journal of Jean Lafitte" is a forgery or not. Discovered in the possession of a claimed descendant.
"My grandmother was a Spanish-Israelite. ... Grandmother told me repeatedly of the trials and tribulations her ancestors had endured at the time of the Spanish Inquisition. ... Grandmother's teachings ... inspired in me a hatred of the Spanish Crown and all the persecutions for which it was responsible -- not only against Jews." [source]
According to one account, Jean Lafitte was killed upon the General Santander, an armed private vessel in the service of Columbia, on Feb. 5, 1823, at the age of 41. In the Gulf of Honduras, the General Santander encountered two Spanish privateers or warships, and was mortally wounded in a brief battle with the vessels and buried at sea ...
According to Lafitte's Journal ( which many believe to be a hoax, claimed to have been found by a great grand son of Lafitte) written by Lafitte himself in 1851, he took the name John Lafflin and died in St. Louis in his 70s. [source]
However, while the origins of Jean Lafitte are controversial, in Jewish Pirates of the Caribbean, author Edward Kritzler makes the claim for several others. Some of the earlier ones are said to have gone into the piracy business as revenge against the inquisition.
One such pirate was Moses Cohen Henriques, who helped plan one of history's largest heists against Spain. In 1628, Henriques set sail with Dutch West India Co. Admiral Piet Hein, whose own hatred of Spain was fueled by four years spent as a galley slave aboard a Spanish ship. Henriques and Hein boarded Spanish ships off Cuba and seized shipments of New World gold and silver worth in today's dollars about the same as Disney's total box office for "Dead Man's Chest." [source]Of course, pirates tend to break a few commandments in their daily routine. Ends rarely justify the means, and revenge isn't generally considered a morally appropriate explanation for deeds. One wonders if the above Jewish pirates recited the Al Chet (confession of sins) yearly on Yom Kippur.
You can read more about Jewish pirates in Jamaica and elsewhere in the Caribbean at Tracing the Tribe.
Amanuensis Monday: Application for the Moolah Shrine Temple - 1927
Amanuensis: A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another.
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, I transcribe the application my great grandfather, Herman Max Feinstein, submitted to the Moolah Shrine Temple for admittance.
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, I transcribe the application my great grandfather, Herman Max Feinstein, submitted to the Moolah Shrine Temple for admittance.
Sunday, September 18, 2011
Week In Review
Below are some noteworthy news stories and blog posts I have read in the past week that deal with my overlapping interests in Genealogy, History, Heritage, and Technology.
Other Weekly Link Lists
- Ancestry Insider discusses Ancestry Content Publisher. While The Insider jokingly describes it as a secret program, some may recall that GeneaMusings discussed it last week, and Modern Software Experience a few days prior.
- Ruth Blair at The Passionate Genealogist shares a list of Historical Audio and Video Collections
- Beth VanVliet at ProGenealogists discusses Family Legends: Fact or Fiction? - and how the research that reveals the family legend to be fiction, may also uncover the truths that led to the legend.
- Lisa Morguess at Life As I Know It shares a report her 9 year old son gave on their Family History.
- GenealogyBlog discusses September 11, 1857 and the Utah Mountain Meadows Massacre. "For many Church members, the Mountain Meadows Massacre is especially poignant since some of its participants, along with so many of the early Utah Mormons, had suffered similar pains and loss at the hands of mobs and militia not very many years before." If anyone wonders what those 'similar pains' were - I suspect it's at least a partial reference to the Missouri-Morman War of the 1830s which you can read more about at Missouri Digital Heritage.
- Heather Stecklein at Museum Minute discusses the preservation of digital scrapbooks.
- GenealogyBank announced that they added 134 million newspaper articles this month, and its newspaper collection now contains over 1 billion records. (And this doesn't include their great collection of obituaries.)
- Back issues of Ancestry Magazine (1994-2010) can be found on Google Books. (hat/tip: GenBlog) [Note: Prior to 1994, the magazine was called Ancestry Newsletter, and these issues don't appear available.]
- James Tanner, an attorney and a genealogist, at Genealogy's Star has a series this week on Copyright, Fair Use, and the Genealogist. (Part One | Part Two | Part Three)
- Levi Sumagaysay at Good Morning Silicon Valley discusses the current status of the ongoing legal fight over Google Books.
- Ancestry.com changed their subscription rates recently, and their stock took a tumble. The Motley Fool discusses whether the tumble is justified.
- Facebook has recently made some changes, obviously in response to the new competition from Google+. Marian Pierre-Louis at Marian's Roots and Rambles asks: How Do You Feel About Followers on Facebook?
- I am personally drooling over the SanDisk Memory Vault discussed at PetaPixel. That is, if the claim is true that the backup drive really does have a 'proven ability' to "preserve data uncorrupted" for 100 years. Of course, knowing how difficult it is to find a computer today with a 5.25 floppy drive, preserving the data isn't everything.
- Matt Ryan at Mobile Lifestyle asks What Will Phones Look Like in Five Years
- Dinosaur Comics discusses Degrees of Information
- Webcam 101 for Seniors (hat/tip: Geneabloggers)
Other Weekly Link Lists
- Susan Petersen's Around the Blogosphere at Long Lost Relatives
- Megan Smolenyak Smolenyak's Genealogy Round Up at MSS's Roots World
- Deb Ruth's Follow Friday Gems at Adventures in Genealogy
- Elizabeth O'Neal's Best Bytes at Little Bytes of Life
Friday, September 16, 2011
Meme: The Tech-Savvy Genealogist
Geniaus created The Tech-Savvy Genealogist Meme.
She came up with 50 items. I expanded the list to 80, and also reworded two of her entries. (I added "Google Video Chat" to #4 and made #40 more generic) My additions were intermingled so the numbering has changed, though I have put an (*) by each of my additions.
The list should be annotated in the following manner:
Things you have already done or found: bold face type
Feel free to add extra comments in brackets after each item
Which of these apply to you?
4. Have used Skype or Google Video Chat to for genealogy purposes
5. Have used a camera to capture images in a library/archives/ancestor's home
6. Use a genealogy software program on your computer to manage your family tree
*7. Use multiple genealogy software programs because they each have different functionalities.
8. Have a Twitter account
9. Tweet daily
10. Have a genealogy blog
11. Have more than one genealogy blog
12. Have lectured/presented to a genealogy group on a technology topic
13. Currently an active member of Genealogy Wise (Still have an account. Stopped using the site when it got taken over by spam. Should I return?)
14. Have a Facebook Account
15. Have connected with genealogists via Facebook
16. Maintain a genealogy related Facebook Page
17. Maintain a blog or website for a genealogy society
18. Have submitted text corrections online to Ancestry, Trove or a similar site
*19. Have added content to a Person Page on Fold3 (formerly Footnote)
20. Have registered a domain name
21. Post regularly to Google+
*24. Have a blog listed on Cyndi's List
*27. Have converted a family videotape to digital
*28. Have converted family movies pre-dating videotape to digital.
29. Own a Flip-Pal or hand-held scanner
30. Can code a webpage in .html
*31. Can code a webpage in .html using Notepad (or any other text-only software)
*32. Can write scripts for your webpage in at least one programming language
*33. Can write scripts for your webpage in multiple programming languages
34. Own a smartphone
35. Have a personal subscription to one or more paid genealogy databases
*36. Have a local library card that offers you home access to online databases, and you use that access.
37. Use a digital voice recorder to record genealogy lectures
38. Have contributed to a genealogy blog carnival
41. Have participated in a genealogy webinar
42. Have taken a DNA test for genealogy purposes
43. Have a personal genealogy website
44. Have found mention of an ancestor in an online newspaper archive
45. Have tweeted during a genealogy lecture
*46. Have tweeted during a family reunion
47. Have scanned your hardcopy genealogy files
48. Use an RSS Reader to follow genealogy news and blogs
49. Have uploaded a gedcom file to a site like Geni, MyHeritage or Ancestry
50. Own a netbook
51. Use a computer/tablet/smartphone to take genealogy lecture notes
52. Have a profile on LinkedIn that mentions your genealogy habit
53. Have developed a genealogy software program, app or widget
54. Have listened to a genealogy podcast online
55. Have downloaded genealogy podcasts for later listening
56. Backup your files to a portable hard drive
57. Have a copy of your genealogy files stored offsite
58. Know about RootsTech
59. Have listened to a BlogTalk radio session about genealogy
60. Use Dropbox, SugarSync or other service to save documents in the cloud
61. Schedule regular email backups
62. Have contributed to the FamilySearch Wiki
63. Have scanned and tagged your genealogy photographs
*66. Have a wearable USB device containing important files. (Watch, keychain necklace, etc)
*67. Created a map on Google Maps plotting ancestral homes or businesses.
*71. Created an entry at FindAGrave for a cemetery
*72. Uploaded the MediaWiki software (or TikiWiki, or PhpWiki) to your family website.
*73. Have downloaded a video (for genealogical purposes) from YouTube or other streaming video site using KeepVid.com, or in some other fashion
*74. Have transferred a video from a DVR to your computer for genealogical purposes
*75. Have participated in a ScanFest
*76. Have started a Genealogy-related meme at least one other geneablogger participated in.
*77. Have started a Genealogy-related weekly blogging theme other geneabloggers participated in.
*80. Printed out a satellite photo from Google Maps of a cemetery, and marked where a tombstone was located on it.
She came up with 50 items. I expanded the list to 80, and also reworded two of her entries. (I added "Google Video Chat" to #4 and made #40 more generic) My additions were intermingled so the numbering has changed, though I have put an (*) by each of my additions.
The list should be annotated in the following manner:
Things you have already done or found: bold face type
Things you would like to do or find: italicize (colour optional)
Things you haven’t done or found and don’t care to: plain typeFeel free to add extra comments in brackets after each item
Which of these apply to you?
1. Own an Android or Windows tablet or an iPad [waiting for the Kindle Android-based Tablet to be released soon...]
2. Use a tablet or iPad for genealogy related purposes
*3. Use a Kindle, Nook, or other e-reader for genealogy related purposes4. Have used Skype or Google Video Chat to for genealogy purposes
5. Have used a camera to capture images in a library/archives/ancestor's home
6. Use a genealogy software program on your computer to manage your family tree
*7. Use multiple genealogy software programs because they each have different functionalities.
8. Have a Twitter account
9. Tweet daily
10. Have a genealogy blog
11. Have more than one genealogy blog
12. Have lectured/presented to a genealogy group on a technology topic
13. Currently an active member of Genealogy Wise (Still have an account. Stopped using the site when it got taken over by spam. Should I return?)
14. Have a Facebook Account
15. Have connected with genealogists via Facebook
16. Maintain a genealogy related Facebook Page
17. Maintain a blog or website for a genealogy society
18. Have submitted text corrections online to Ancestry, Trove or a similar site
*19. Have added content to a Person Page on Fold3 (formerly Footnote)
20. Have registered a domain name
21. Post regularly to Google+
*22. Have participated in a genealogy-related Google+ hangout
23. Have a blog listed on Geneabloggers*24. Have a blog listed on Cyndi's List
25. Have transcribed/indexed records for FamilySearch or a similar project
*26. Have converted a family audiotape to digital*27. Have converted a family videotape to digital
*28. Have converted family movies pre-dating videotape to digital.
29. Own a Flip-Pal or hand-held scanner
30. Can code a webpage in .html
*31. Can code a webpage in .html using Notepad (or any other text-only software)
*32. Can write scripts for your webpage in at least one programming language
*33. Can write scripts for your webpage in multiple programming languages
34. Own a smartphone
35. Have a personal subscription to one or more paid genealogy databases
*36. Have a local library card that offers you home access to online databases, and you use that access.
37. Use a digital voice recorder to record genealogy lectures
38. Have contributed to a genealogy blog carnival
*39. Have hosted a genealogy blog carnival
40. Use an Internet Browser that didn’t come installed on your computer41. Have participated in a genealogy webinar
42. Have taken a DNA test for genealogy purposes
43. Have a personal genealogy website
44. Have found mention of an ancestor in an online newspaper archive
45. Have tweeted during a genealogy lecture
*46. Have tweeted during a family reunion
47. Have scanned your hardcopy genealogy files
48. Use an RSS Reader to follow genealogy news and blogs
49. Have uploaded a gedcom file to a site like Geni, MyHeritage or Ancestry
50. Own a netbook
51. Use a computer/tablet/smartphone to take genealogy lecture notes
52. Have a profile on LinkedIn that mentions your genealogy habit
53. Have developed a genealogy software program, app or widget
54. Have listened to a genealogy podcast online
55. Have downloaded genealogy podcasts for later listening
56. Backup your files to a portable hard drive
57. Have a copy of your genealogy files stored offsite
58. Know about RootsTech
59. Have listened to a BlogTalk radio session about genealogy
60. Use Dropbox, SugarSync or other service to save documents in the cloud
61. Schedule regular email backups
62. Have contributed to the FamilySearch Wiki
63. Have scanned and tagged your genealogy photographs
64. Have published a genealogy book in an online/digital format
*65. Brought a USB device to a microfilm repository so you could download instead of print.*66. Have a wearable USB device containing important files. (Watch, keychain necklace, etc)
*67. Created a map on Google Maps plotting ancestral homes or businesses.
*68. Recorded the GPS coordinates for a tombstone, or ancestral home
*69. Edited the Wikipedia entry for an ancestor, or their kin
*70. Created an entry at FindAGrave for a person*71. Created an entry at FindAGrave for a cemetery
*72. Uploaded the MediaWiki software (or TikiWiki, or PhpWiki) to your family website.
*73. Have downloaded a video (for genealogical purposes) from YouTube or other streaming video site using KeepVid.com, or in some other fashion
*74. Have transferred a video from a DVR to your computer for genealogical purposes
*75. Have participated in a ScanFest
*76. Have started a Genealogy-related meme at least one other geneablogger participated in.
*77. Have started a Genealogy-related weekly blogging theme other geneabloggers participated in.
*78. Have used Photoshop (or other editing software) to ‘clean up’ an old family photo
*79. Done digital scrapbooking*80. Printed out a satellite photo from Google Maps of a cemetery, and marked where a tombstone was located on it.
Monday, September 12, 2011
Amanuensis Monday: Reassignment, The Italian Navy, and The World Series
Amanuensis: A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another.
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, I transcribe a letter my grandfather, Martin Deutsch (1907-1991) wrote to my grandmother, Myrtle Van Every Deutsch (1900-1951) on September 12, 1943, while he was stationed overseas.
I continue my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts. Not only do the documents contain genealogical information, the words breathe life into kin - some I never met - others I see a time in their life before I knew them.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
***
This week, I transcribe a letter my grandfather, Martin Deutsch (1907-1991) wrote to my grandmother, Myrtle Van Every Deutsch (1900-1951) on September 12, 1943, while he was stationed overseas.
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Week In Review
Below are some noteworthy news stories and blog posts I have read in the past week that deal with my overlapping interests in Genealogy, History, Heritage, and Technology.
Tears don't flow the same in space. International Space Station astronaut, Frank Culbertson, shares his 9/11 story.
Other Weekly Link Lists
Several individuals who usually have posts listed below took a vacation this week. It might have something to do with the Federation of Genealogical Societies Conference in Springfield, IL.
- Discussing the Genealogical Proof Standard, James Tanner at Genealogy's Star asks What is Reasonable? Where do I search? Earlier this week, he also shared his alleged cousinship to William Shakespeare. Though he appears to have some doubts.
- Barbara J Mathews at The Demanding Genealogist shares an experience where Wikipedia was Misled by an Online Ahnentafel
- Randy Seaver at GeneaMusings feels Genealogical Societies Should Consider Ancestry Content Publisher
- The Illinois State Genealogical Society announces the debut of The Insider's Guide to Illinois Genealogy.
- Irish Newspaper Archives, one of the largest digital collections of Irish newspapers, is offering free access through December of 2011. (hat/tip: JewishGen)
- Lee Drew at Family History with the LineageKeeper shares an extensive list of archaic job titles and what they mean.
- Taco Goulooze, from It All Makes Census shares a newspaper article from 1890 headlined, The Census Killed Him. He also shares an article concerning the 1940 census. Apparently, for the first time in that year, they surveyed mobile homes.
- Michael Stern Hart, inventor of electronic books, and the founder of Project Gutenberg, passed away on Sept 6.
- A New York Times article discusses a recent son's discovery that he had 149 half-siblings through his sperm donor father.
Tears don't flow the same in space. International Space Station astronaut, Frank Culbertson, shares his 9/11 story.
(9/11/01 - taken from International Space Station - photograph source: NASA)
Other Weekly Link Lists
Several individuals who usually have posts listed below took a vacation this week. It might have something to do with the Federation of Genealogical Societies Conference in Springfield, IL.
- Ruth Blair's Ruth's Recommendations at The Passionate Genealogist
- Elizabeth O'Neal's Best Bytes at Little Bytes of Life
- Lynn Palermo's Monday Morning Mentions at The Armchair Genealogist
- Susan Petersen's Around the Blogosphere at Long Lost Relatives
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Civilian Occupation Codes II - NARA Discovered their Error in 2005
Last week I discovered that NARA and Ancestry had changed the Civilian Occupations on all of their World War II Army Enlistment Records. These records are transcriptions derived from microfilmed punch cards - so they were prone to human error from the start. However, it was apparent that the list of occupation codes that was originally used to interpret the cards was wrong. I found a copy of the original list, and the current list.
What I didn't know was when the discovery was made.
The below release from NARA is dated in December of 2005.
The records I retrieved from Ancestry.com with the wrong occupations - I retrieved from May to October, 2007.
I still don't know when Ancestry's records were updated.
The following comes from the "Reference Copy of Technical Documentation for Accessioned Electronic Records." (PDF available from NARA.gov)
Following numerous user complaints that the Civilian Occupation Code interpretations did not match what was known from other sources, an investigation was conducted into the sources of the code books and keypunch operator manuals used when punching the Enlistment card's Civilian Occupation Code field.
There were several code books and operator's manuals in use during Wodd War II for coding civilian occupations, depending upon which War Department form or IBM punch card was being punched. Two codebooks were discovered in the records of the Textual Records Division, Modem Military Records (NWCTM) and Modem Civilian Records (NWCTC): Civilian Occupational Classification of Enlisted Personnel (TM 12-426) (War Department 1 July 1944) and Army Regulations No. 615-26 (AR 615-26) (War Department September 15, 1942). These employed two civilian occupation coding systems, the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) and the US Army's Specification Serial Number. The latter was considered by Army to be a better way to match soldiers' civilian occupations with their military occupation specialties (MOS). Both were used when keypunching W.D., A.G.O. Form No. 20, the Soldier's Qualification Card. Both coding systems were mistakenly used together when assigning interpretations to the Civilian Occupation Codes found in the Army Serial Number Electronic File, ca. 1938 -1946: Merged Processed File. When used together, the two coding systems frequently assigned two different interpretations to the same code, resulting in user confusion.
Civilian occupation information was furnished by the enlistee or inductee during their interview at the Recruit Reception Center. Based upon the individual's statements, the interviewer wrote down an Occupation Code that was looked up in was looked up in Code No. 30, Civilian Occupation, in Technical Manual 12-310 (15 January 1944). Code 30 was supplemented by Code 30A, Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT). This code written in a box on the individual's Enlistment Record (W.D.A.G.O. Form 22) or the Report of Physical Examination and Induction (Armed Forces' Original D.S.S. Form 221). Though no complete version of Code 30A was found during our investigation of the coding errors, three pages were found in a draft version of Technical Manual (TM) 12-310 that was circulated on July 7, 1942. Later (1945) WD AGO Form 372 keypunch operators were instructed by the Machine Records Operation Technical Manual (TM 12-305), 1 November 1945, that ''the first three digits ofthe codes in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles will be used."
Upon discovery that Civilian Occupational Classification of Enlisted Personnel (TM 12-426) (War Department 1 July 1944) and Army Regulations No. 615-26 (AR 615-26) (War Department September 15, 1942) were intended for use with the Soldier's Qualification Card, these folders were removed from the documentation. They were replaced by copies of portions the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, Part I of III, Definitions of Titles, Prepared by the Job Analysis and Information Section Division of Standards and Research (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1939, 1943 and 1945).
Accession No: NN3-064-03-008
Prepared by Lee A. Gladwin, Archivist
Date: December 28, 2005
What I didn't know was when the discovery was made.
The below release from NARA is dated in December of 2005.
The records I retrieved from Ancestry.com with the wrong occupations - I retrieved from May to October, 2007.
I still don't know when Ancestry's records were updated.
The following comes from the "Reference Copy of Technical Documentation for Accessioned Electronic Records." (PDF available from NARA.gov)
Supplemental User Note 5
Army Serial Number Electronic File, ca. 1938 -1946: Merged Processed File NN3-064-03-008
Civilian Occupation Codes
Following numerous user complaints that the Civilian Occupation Code interpretations did not match what was known from other sources, an investigation was conducted into the sources of the code books and keypunch operator manuals used when punching the Enlistment card's Civilian Occupation Code field.
There were several code books and operator's manuals in use during Wodd War II for coding civilian occupations, depending upon which War Department form or IBM punch card was being punched. Two codebooks were discovered in the records of the Textual Records Division, Modem Military Records (NWCTM) and Modem Civilian Records (NWCTC): Civilian Occupational Classification of Enlisted Personnel (TM 12-426) (War Department 1 July 1944) and Army Regulations No. 615-26 (AR 615-26) (War Department September 15, 1942). These employed two civilian occupation coding systems, the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) and the US Army's Specification Serial Number. The latter was considered by Army to be a better way to match soldiers' civilian occupations with their military occupation specialties (MOS). Both were used when keypunching W.D., A.G.O. Form No. 20, the Soldier's Qualification Card. Both coding systems were mistakenly used together when assigning interpretations to the Civilian Occupation Codes found in the Army Serial Number Electronic File, ca. 1938 -1946: Merged Processed File. When used together, the two coding systems frequently assigned two different interpretations to the same code, resulting in user confusion.
Civilian occupation information was furnished by the enlistee or inductee during their interview at the Recruit Reception Center. Based upon the individual's statements, the interviewer wrote down an Occupation Code that was looked up in was looked up in Code No. 30, Civilian Occupation, in Technical Manual 12-310 (15 January 1944). Code 30 was supplemented by Code 30A, Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT). This code written in a box on the individual's Enlistment Record (W.D.A.G.O. Form 22) or the Report of Physical Examination and Induction (Armed Forces' Original D.S.S. Form 221). Though no complete version of Code 30A was found during our investigation of the coding errors, three pages were found in a draft version of Technical Manual (TM) 12-310 that was circulated on July 7, 1942. Later (1945) WD AGO Form 372 keypunch operators were instructed by the Machine Records Operation Technical Manual (TM 12-305), 1 November 1945, that ''the first three digits ofthe codes in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles will be used."
Upon discovery that Civilian Occupational Classification of Enlisted Personnel (TM 12-426) (War Department 1 July 1944) and Army Regulations No. 615-26 (AR 615-26) (War Department September 15, 1942) were intended for use with the Soldier's Qualification Card, these folders were removed from the documentation. They were replaced by copies of portions the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, Part I of III, Definitions of Titles, Prepared by the Job Analysis and Information Section Division of Standards and Research (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1939, 1943 and 1945).
Accession No: NN3-064-03-008
Prepared by Lee A. Gladwin, Archivist
Date: December 28, 2005
Monday, September 5, 2011
Amanuensis Takes a Holiday
Amanuensis: A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another.
As I did in 2009 and 2010, in honor of Labor Day, I am taking a holiday from my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
As I did in 2009 and 2010, in honor of Labor Day, I am taking a holiday from my project to transcribe family letters, journals, newspaper articles, audiotapes, and other historical artifacts.
I began this project back in February of 2009, and since then, many others have joined in on the meme. Why do we transcribe? I provide my three reasons in the linked post. You may find others. If you participate, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments.
Sunday, September 4, 2011
Week In Review
Below are some noteworthy news stories and blog posts I have read in the past week that deal with my overlapping interests in Genealogy, History, Heritage, and Technology.
Other Weekly Link Lists
- ESPN has a story on how two NFL football players discovered they were half-brothers.
- Megan Smolenyak Smolenyak at Huffington Post shares the story of an Orphan Heirloom Rescue of an 1870 Irish Immigrant's diary.
- Tamura Jones at Modern Software Experience discusses Ancestry's attempt to get genealogy societies to upload their collections in Ancestry Content Publisher Programme and Some Ancestry Content Publisher Considerations.
- Jasia at CreativeGene announces the creation of a new blog, by a team of already established geneabloggers. The Catholic Gene will focus on topics of interest to the Catholic genealogist, or the genealogist researching Catholic ancestors.
- Stephen Danko at Steve's Genealogy Blog discusses the History of the Holy Cross Church in Warsaw, Poland.
- Philip Trauring at Blood and Frogs notes that JewishGen has changed the name of two of their site features, replacing the word Shtetl. But, more important than the name change, is the reminder that these features exist. The ShtetlSeeker/Gazeteer and the ShtetlLinks/KehlilaLinks.
- Tablet Magazine reports a new synagogue is opening in an area of Lower Manhattan that hasn't had a synagogue since before the Civil War.
- Amy Coffin at The WeTree Genealogy considers what it might be like if Genealogists were in the Tabloids
- Elizabeth O'Neal at Little Bytes of Life shares All I Really Need to Know about Genealogy I Learned in Kindergarten
- Piers Cawley at OSCON 2011 (OReilly Open Source Convention) shares a protest song: Child of the Library (hat/tip Disruptive Library Technology Jester)
Other Weekly Link Lists
- Randy Seaver's Best of the Genea-Blogs at Genea-Musings
- Liz Haigney Lynch's Links at The Ancestral Archaeologis
- Ruth Blair's Ruth's Recommendations at The Passionate Genealogist
- Megan Smolenyak Smolenyak's Genealogy Round Up at MSS Roots World
- Julie Cahill Tarr's Friday Finds at GenBlog
- Susan Clark's Follow Friday at Nolichucky Roots
Saturday, September 3, 2011
Happy Labo(u)r Day Weekend
In Canada and the U.S., Labo(u)r Day is Monday, Sept 5th. For all celebrating:
Evan Greer - Never Walk Across a Picket Line
Pete Seeger and Arlo Guthrie - Union Maid
Pete Seeger - Solidarity Forever
Billy Bragg - There is Power in a Union
Dropkick Murphys - Worker's Song
Happy Labo(u)r Day!
Evan Greer - Never Walk Across a Picket Line
Pete Seeger and Arlo Guthrie - Union Maid
Pete Seeger - Solidarity Forever
Billy Bragg - There is Power in a Union
Dropkick Murphys - Worker's Song
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Civil Occupation Codes: What's Going On Here?
If you copied the transcriptions of WWII enlistment records from Ancestry.com in the past, it might be prudent to do a search and see if the "Civil Occupation" has been changed.
Depending upon when you made the copy, there is a very good chance that it has. I don't know yet the date the records were updated/corrected.
As I mentioned in my post earlier today, I noticed that Ancestry's WW2 Enlistment record for my Great Uncle, Mandell Newmark, had changed since I copied it in 2007. The Civil Occupation had been changed from "Bandsman, Oboe or Parts Clerk, Automobile" to "Salespersons."
It was my belief that the original transcriber of the record had misread the Occupation Code. That is no longer my belief. The Civil Occupations on other Enlistment Records I screen-grabbed back in 2007 are now different too.
Mandell Newmark
Formerly "Bandsman, Oboe or Parts Clerk, Automobile"
Now "Salesperson"


Seymour Feinstein
Was: Railway Signal Operator
Now: Salesmen and sales agents, except to consumers


Sidney Feinstein
Was: Foreman, Laundry or Foreman, Auto Repair Shop
Now: Foremen, services amusements


Cruvant Altman
Was: Barber or Lawyer (Attorney or counselor at law)
Now: Lawyers and Judges


It seems that the Occupation Code List has changed as well.
The original list can be seen on the Kansas GenWeb site
Their citation: Electronic Army Serial Number Merged File, ca. 1938 - 1946 [Electronic Records]; Data Table: ENLISTMENT RECORDS; Record Group 64: Records of the National Archives and Records Administration; Series: World War II Army Enlistment Records, 6/1/2002 - 9/30/2002. (Online version on July 16, 2005 at http://www.archives.gov/aad/index.html.)
The current list can be found at archives.gov (as/of today: Aug 31, 2011)
Their citation: File unit: Electronic Army Serial Number Merged File, ca. 1938 - 1946 (Enlistment Records)
in the Series: World War II Army Enlistment Records, created 6/1/2002 - 9/30/2002, documenting the period ca. 1938 - 1946. - Record Group 64
The two lists are significantly different.
Comparing the old and new descriptions to the old and new Occupation Code lists reveals that in none of the cases above did the occupation code change. The transcription error was not in reading the code. The transcription error was apparently using the wrong list. Meaning this wasn't an error in one or two records. The error would have been in ALL of them.
Did Ancestry.com or the National Archives ever make an announcement that they had erred, and that those who had looked up records before should look again? It's very possible they did and I missed it. Maybe others did too.
Depending upon when you made the copy, there is a very good chance that it has. I don't know yet the date the records were updated/corrected.
As I mentioned in my post earlier today, I noticed that Ancestry's WW2 Enlistment record for my Great Uncle, Mandell Newmark, had changed since I copied it in 2007. The Civil Occupation had been changed from "Bandsman, Oboe or Parts Clerk, Automobile" to "Salespersons."
It was my belief that the original transcriber of the record had misread the Occupation Code. That is no longer my belief. The Civil Occupations on other Enlistment Records I screen-grabbed back in 2007 are now different too.
Mandell Newmark
Formerly "Bandsman, Oboe or Parts Clerk, Automobile"
Now "Salesperson"


Seymour Feinstein
Was: Railway Signal Operator
Now: Salesmen and sales agents, except to consumers


Sidney Feinstein
Was: Foreman, Laundry or Foreman, Auto Repair Shop
Now: Foremen, services amusements


Cruvant Altman
Was: Barber or Lawyer (Attorney or counselor at law)
Now: Lawyers and Judges


It seems that the Occupation Code List has changed as well.
The original list can be seen on the Kansas GenWeb site
Their citation: Electronic Army Serial Number Merged File, ca. 1938 - 1946 [Electronic Records]; Data Table: ENLISTMENT RECORDS; Record Group 64: Records of the National Archives and Records Administration; Series: World War II Army Enlistment Records, 6/1/2002 - 9/30/2002. (Online version on July 16, 2005 at http://www.archives.gov/aad/index.html.)
The current list can be found at archives.gov (as/of today: Aug 31, 2011)
Their citation: File unit: Electronic Army Serial Number Merged File, ca. 1938 - 1946 (Enlistment Records)
in the Series: World War II Army Enlistment Records, created 6/1/2002 - 9/30/2002, documenting the period ca. 1938 - 1946. - Record Group 64
The two lists are significantly different.
Comparing the old and new descriptions to the old and new Occupation Code lists reveals that in none of the cases above did the occupation code change. The transcription error was not in reading the code. The transcription error was apparently using the wrong list. Meaning this wasn't an error in one or two records. The error would have been in ALL of them.
Did Ancestry.com or the National Archives ever make an announcement that they had erred, and that those who had looked up records before should look again? It's very possible they did and I missed it. Maybe others did too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)