I don't believe these men are the same individual. They have different ears, different eye shapes, different brows, and different noses. Their hair is parted on different sides of the head, and although that can change over time, I've noticed many men keep the part on the same side of the head because of the way the hair grows or to deal with cowlicks.
Interesting. When I looked at the photos, I saw nearly identical eyes, nose, mouth and ears. I wondered if the part was possibly the result of a photographic error producing a mirror image effect.
I have to agree with Miriam, these are two different men. Not only the ears, but the foreheads as well--one appears to have a widow's peak, while the other appears to just have a high forehead. The eyes and quite differents, as is the way the eyebrows end. As well the length fo the face. The jaw line and chin are similar and the lips to some degree. Could it be a cousin? Or perhaps a doppelganger? Just my two cents...:)
Transylvania, Holland, Alsace, Poland, England, Germany, Lithuania and Texas all contain soil upon which ancestors dwelt; Farmers, beekeepers, shepherds, tailors, blacksmiths, salesmen, clergy, judges, and doctors.
As I research ancestral lines I discover some ancestors celebrated Hanuka, others Christmas, and still others the Green Corn Ceremony; Jewish, Methodist Episcopalian, Puritan, Christian Scientist, Mennonite, Choctaw, and Cherokee.
I shall never find the records for my distant ancestors who either came to this continent by crossing the Land Bridge, or originally emerged from the Nanih Waiya in Mississippi.
I delve through obituaries, microfilm depositories, internet databases; I interview relatives, and rummage through attics.
What I find doesn't alter who I am; It illuminates the divergent, yet still intersecting paths of my ancestors.
5 comments:
I don't believe these men are the same individual. They have different ears, different eye shapes, different brows, and different noses. Their hair is parted on different sides of the head, and although that can change over time, I've noticed many men keep the part on the same side of the head because of the way the hair grows or to deal with cowlicks.
Interesting. When I looked at the photos, I saw nearly identical eyes, nose, mouth and ears. I wondered if the part was possibly the result of a photographic error producing a mirror image effect.
I think the man on the left actually looks more like the son (Everett). Any chance it could be another relative, John?
Lisa
100 Years in America
Small-leaved Shamrock
A light that shines again
Carnival of Irish Heritage & Culture
That's the problem with unlabeled photographs - they can be anybody.
Even if you think you see similarities between them and another photo, you can be wrong.
I have to agree with Miriam, these are two different men. Not only the ears, but the foreheads as well--one appears to have a widow's peak, while the other appears to just have a high forehead. The eyes and quite differents, as is the way the eyebrows end. As well the length fo the face.
The jaw line and chin are similar and the lips to some degree. Could it be a cousin? Or perhaps a doppelganger?
Just my two cents...:)
Post a Comment